![]() There are two things you should try to keep in mind:ġ) The actual cognitive functions test doesn’t take your responses at face value, and it “thinks around” your answers.Ģ) This analysis page works the same way. I often read lines about how "the cognitive functions are the real MBTI" or how people "have been reading up and learning about the cognitive functions for years" and just about always reveal that they have been exposed only to sources that give one side of the story what such people often don't realize is that in order to really understand the cognitive functions, they must be willing to challenge the dogma that proliferates misinformation about what it means to be you. Bear in mind that this isn't necessary, but it will aid you in understanding the perspective from which all of this is passed onto you. It may help you understand what the test really is beyond "a cognitive function test" and will familiarize you with some of the language used here to describe your results. Vigor significado full#There's an entire culture created around the cognitive functions, and challenging it isn't exactly easy.īefore continuing, I strongly suggest reading Full context: the cognitive functions to get an idea of how this function test and the following analysis will look at your results. ![]() I'm sure some people have even figured it out-but they certainly haven't set the tone of the conversation. ![]() I've seen social media posts and blog posts (in many different languages, even) trying to explain in detail what the results exactly mean, and some people are definitely on the right track. Some people have made serious efforts, though. The two-year-old "frequently asked questions" section underneath your results is dense and often superfluous, so it doesn't surprise me now that people weren't really able to piece together the mystery of the Sakinorva cognitive function test. This website has many disjointed, messy articles about the meaning of type that I'd written as a teenager, and making sense of the underlying perspective behind all that can be… an arduous task. The information for you to understand what this test really means is all out there. The mystery, it would seem, is at the very end-when everything finally gets calculated and the test gives you a few types. I think a typology veteran well aware of what the cognitive functions are would easily recognize the basic format of the test: a 96 question test that asks 12 questions to test for each of the eight functions. I bring this up because this test has more layers than would initially seem. Many people were confused by what their results meant, yes, but the format of the test was never fundamentally called into question-at least, not in any way that impacted how widely the test was shared. I think what I was most surprised by when I launched this test back in April 2018 was how easily people accepted it into the personality test world. Functionality will eventually be added that will give you a unique identifier to return to this page. In the meantime… enjoy!Īs things are set up right now, you won't be able to return to this page if your browser session ends or expires. Both function models currently used (the Grant/Brownsword model and the Myers model) are not talked about at all. ![]() This section is also a work-in-progress! Only the first part has been finished so far. This page is an experiment in computer generated meta-analysis-it serves to automatically interpret your data based on patterns in testing that I have noticed personally. If you truly understand typology and its merits, I think you'll find the information provided here-not the results on the function test-to be revealing of your test-taking habits.īefore we start, however, I must make clear to you that not all of your questions will be answered. Disclaimer: This page serves to help you understand the meaning behind your responses. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |